![]() | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
It is interesting, and not coincidental that I Corinthians was written around the time of the Passover, and the Days of Unleavened Bread. The church of God at Corinth, as we have found out, was in great need of instruction on the inherent meaning of the festivals of God. I have shown in these last two sermons (I hope) that the members of the Corinthian church were exposed to perverse and shameful sins on a daily basis. They lived among the most wretched moral circumstances of their time. Not only was Corinth known far and wide for its cultic prostitution to Aphrodite (Diana), it was full of other sexual sins. Corinth was also full of idolatrythere were many temples there in Corinth. Paul mentions in one place that the city was full of extortion, and drunkenness, and who knows what else was there in the vice-city of the day. Paul's message to the Corinthians, in an overall sense I think, can be boiled down to the lessons of this particular festival season. Like I said, he wrote it down about this season of the year. These ideas were on his mind. He was thinking about this and applying it to their situation. And those lessons are thesethat we have been redeemed from such a life of sin; that we have been called out of the world full of sin by the Father; and that the sacrifice of Jesus Christ has covered usredeemed us. Our job, after we believe and repent, is to make sure that we do not fall back into those sins; and we do this through maturing as a Christian. Now, we saw last time in I Corinthians 3 that the Corinthian church was very young, and as Paul said, very carnal. They were babes in Christ. And, they had the disadvantage of living in "Sin City," 24 hours a day, seven days a week. So, not only did they have the baggage of past corruption that they had to overcome, they had almost constant temptation to return to their former lives of sin. So, how does Paul deal with this less than ideal situation? He could have advocated that the whole church just pick up and move to some remote valley in the mountains somewhere and practice their beliefs in lonely serenity. But as we will see, in Corinthians 5 he rejects this outright. Perhaps he had heard while speaking with the other apostles of Jesus' prayer, which would one day be written by the apostle John in his gospel account, chapter 17. And, in verse 15 of that chapter, Jesus Christ said that He asked the Father not to take them out of the world, but that He should protect them from the Evil One. So, if mass exodus from the environment of sin is not the answer, then what course is left? Turn to John 5 and I will show you the answer to this question from Jesus' point of view. Jesus Christ, of course, is our model. His life shows us the way to live. And, listen to what He says when He is asked certain questions here:
Now, turn to chapter 7. This, here, is an answer to a question that had been asked of Him, and they were wondering why Jesus was so wise. How was it He had the answers to all these things? This is also important to keep in the back of your mind.
That should set us up for this sermon today. I have just given you the theme of this sermon, judging with righteous judgment. Now, we notice (if you would think about this for a minute) that the Father did not have His Son live out His life in obscurity in a desert place where He might be in contact with only a few people coming through. But rather, He had Him live in the cities and towns of Palestine among the people, despite being surrounded by sin. And we know from what was written in the gospels that there were prostitutes, and self-righteous Pharisees; there were people taking advantage of one another; there were crooked tax collectors stealing and extorting the people; there were the Romans and their cruelty, and other such things and sins in Judea at the time. And despite this, Jesus maintained a sinless life. How? In His own testimony from John 5, and John 7, He sought not his own will, but His Father's will in everything. And because of this, He judged every matter with righteous judgment. He could live sinlessly in the midst of corruption because He could make righteous judgments and follow them, always seeking to please His Father. He always had that at the forefront of His mind. In any situation that comes up, you say, "OkayHow am I going to glorify God in this? What did God teach me? What is His will? Okay, then that is what I will do." And He did it. We should too. He had a much stronger will than most of us have. And of course, with some practice, He was able to make these decisions promptly on the spot. And, that is the perfectionthe maturitythat we are trying to get to and reach. So, today, we are going to look at the Corinthian church from the perspective of the Feast of the Days of Unleavened Bread, and see (as we have just done in this little precursor) Paul's solution to their carnality, and the ever-present temptations that were there all around them at Corinth. And we will see this unfold as we go through this. But, before we get to the Corinthians, we have to go back to Exodus 12. I am going to read this passage for two reasons. One, because it is the holy day, and it is good to touch bases on these very basic elements of the holy day, but also (two) because Paul draws on this material for part of his teaching in I Corinthians 5.
I just wanted you to hear these things because this sets up the symbolism and meaning that Paul is going to draw from. Note that the Passover lamb, whose blood saved the Israelites from the death angel, is obviously a type of Christ's blood. He is the Lamb without blemish. That blood, then, was put on the doorpost, and it is a type of covering for our sinsredeeming us from bondage to this worldsaving us from death. And, as we know, this same blood opens the way for a relationship with the Father. As it says in Hebrews that Christ has gone through the veil, and is our Mediator before the throne of God. So, we have a connection to the very God of the Universe, the One who is called The Father. This is all very basic stuff. I am going over this so I can lay the groundwork. The dominant symbol of the feast of the Days of Unleavened Bread is leaven, or the lack and absence of leaven. Leaven is a symbol of corruption. Most of you know how yeast works. We have been through this many times. When yeast works in dough, it causes fermentation to occur. And, fermentation is a process of breaking apart, or breaking down. When fermentation occurs, one of the byproducts is carbon dioxide gas, and this is trapped in the dough causing it to puff up, expand, rise, and inflate, until it is nice and lightand we enjoy eating fluffy soft bread very much. It even produces a slightly sour taste in the finished product. As a matter of fact, the Hebrew word for leavening means, "to sour." So, fermentation regardless what form it takes causes the thing to sour somewhat. Now, if left to continue in the doughnot stopped by cold (refrigeration), or heat (baking)the yeast will eventually utterly consume the dough. That is what it is feeding on. (Sugar, yes, but yeast also converts starch to sugar.) And of course, once it gets to that point, the dough is useless. This action of the yeast in the dough is nearly a perfect parallel to the working of, the spread of, and the effects of sin in a person, and in a group. Once it infects a person, and the person is allowed to remain, the sin begins to spread from him to the others. It is just a true principle. It is like a law of the universe. We now have the background to what Paul is about to teach the Corinthians.
Now, this problem and situation of this very perverse sin in the congregation was perhaps the most pressing problem among those in the Corinthian church. And, Paul needed to deal with this quickly because of its potential to corrupt. And already, in fact, as he mentions here, another sin had sprung from this one. And, it was one that was also very bad and insidiousthe proud, self-righteous attitude of some of the brethren over their very tolerant and lenient stance toward the sinner. That was their problem. They were treating this sinner with kid-gloves and allowing him to remain among them. And, Paul, who was hundreds of miles away, saw clearly and plainly enough to say, "Get this man out of there! He is going to affect all of you in a bad way! Get him out!" So, he is very pointed, and very strong in telling them to get this guy out of the congregation. Twice, Paul invokes the name of the Lord as his authority, "Get him out!" Of course, Paul did not do this in any vindictive way. He wanted to wake the man up to the seriousness of his sin, and spur repentance in him if possible. And, he also did it to protect the rest of the church. So, he had two reasons here. He wanted to help the man, and protect the church. Of course, things had already started to go bad, and so he had some work to do to make sure that the sin was overcome. Now, verses 6 through 8 focus on the church's puffed up attitude. And, what he tells them, is that their attitude stinks. "You guys have this all wrong! And moreover, it had already corrupted the whole lump," he says. The whole churcheverybodyhad been infected one way or another. Their tolerant, proud reaction to this very perverse sinso perverse that the gentiles would not condone ittold Paul that the whole congregation had been infected by a wrong spirit. And this spirit needed to be purged. And, he perceived (if you read between the lines) that they had dragged this wrong spirit in with them from the world. How do I know that? Because Paul calls it, "old leaven," They had dragged it in from the world, and their old lives before their conversion. Now, if you will remember that Paul uses an image of the old man and the new man. And here, he uses a similar one of old leaven, and the new, unleavened. So, whatever it was that they brought in with them, they had either never really repented of it, or they had reverted back to it. Either way, there was something that had lingered from their previous time in the world, and they had never seen the seriousness of it, and therefore, had never dealt with it; or because of their immaturity or their weakness, they had actually gone back to it. So he commands them to purge, or clean out the old leaventhe corruption left over from their old manthe one who was suppose to die in baptism with all his baggage. So, all this old baggage, their old habits, the old ways of thinking from before their conversion needed to go. He urges them to purge these sins so that they will truly be new creations. I was telling David Grabbe yesterday, as I was talking through some of this, that I think that this might be the first time that he uses this symbol or image of old versus new. Because, I believe that Corinthians was written earlier than the other books where he also mentions something similar. I am not exactly certain of this. But Paul is getting the ground work going for this image that comes to be much more prominent in later letters. In any case, he wants them to purge these sins so that they will truly be new creationsa new lump. He tells them Christ died for their forgiveness (and ours too), and their redemption. That has happened, "for indeed, Christ our Passover was sacrificed for us." So, He covered them, He justified them at the time of their baptism. So, we can truly say that we are unleavened. He had done His part. What Paul is telling them to do is to make sure that they remained unleavened by purging anything of corruption from themselves, and to continue the workevery sin, every bad habit, every wrong attitude that had been allowed to return, or had never really been dealt with yet. So, Christ has done His part; now it is time for them (us) to do their (our) part by purging out what remained. Turn to I Peter 4 and we will see a similar exhortation.
He is talking about a lot of the same things that were plaguing the Corinthian church. Turn to Ephesians 4, and we will see how this imagery finally developed.
So, even though we have been unleavened, there is something for us to do beyond that. We have to continue to purge, and we have to do what we can to remain unleavened. Or, we can say, "Go on to perfection." So, going back to I Corinthians 5, he encourages them, as he closes that section in verse 8, to make the Feast of the Days of Unleavened Bread a turning point in their lives. Celebrate the Holy Days free of their old attitudes, and of mental, verbal, and behavioral sins; and on the other hand, be filled with pure and true thoughts, words, and deeds. So, as we have always said, get rid of the old, and put in the new, the better, the Godly. Now, what was it about these Corinthians that had to change? What was the prime factor that Paul chose to target in these Corinthians? I have already given you the answer in my introduction. He decided to target their ability to make proper judgments. They were not making good choices. And this had to change. They had to learn to make right and Godly decisions. But, their pridepuffed-up statuswas not allowing them to. Turn to I Corinthians 5 again, and we will read the next section.
He comes right back at it and says it again, just in case they did not get it the first time. "Disfellowship this man with this sexual sin." Now, we can see that he focuses on judgment as he wraps up his comments on this situation, here, with this man. He had written a previous letter, and had said to them not to fellowship with sexually immoral people. Yet, even this simple instruction confounded them. It seemed to confuse them. They misunderstood Paul. They thought he was talking about the people in the world. And he said, "Hey! What do we have to do with those people in the world? We have been called out of that world. My instructions were to you, and your own in the church. We have a responsibility to maintain order among ourselves. We do not have any power like that outside the church. God has not given that to us; He has reserved that to Himself." He tells them essentially, "What you thought was ridiculous." So Paul meant that they were to disfellowship church members who are egregious persistent sinners. "Our bailiwick is the church. We do not have jurisdiction over those who are outside the church of God." They were not judging with righteous judgment. In fact, what they were doing was turning righteous judgment on its head. They were doing the exact opposite to what they should have been doing. What they seem to have been doing was condemning the perversions of the citizens of Corinth, to the point of shunning contact with them, but they were being tolerant and charitable to the same types of sins inside the church among the brethren. Like I said, that should have been the exact opposite. We, as a churchnot just the ministrybut as a church have the responsibility to guard the virtue and the witness of the church of God by judging the conduct of church members, and enforcing certain disciplines, which includes disfellowshipping people. Now, these are to be done in love and mercy, and they are to be done according to the scriptures and instructions that have been laid down. They are always done in order to spur on repentance, and to protect the flock. It was easy to see that there was something screwy in their thinking. If they were to take something as simple as, "Do not fellowship with sexually immoral persons," and turn it on its head, there must have been something wrong in the way that they thoughtin the patterns of their thinkingin the way that they came to decisions. Something was wrong. It was certainly carnal. We know that from chapter 3 where Paul tells them that they are still carnal. He could not speak to them as mature because they had not grown up yet. They still had to have the milk, the basics, of the word because they were still babes in Christ. Their understanding and their ability to apply God's instruction was very immature. It would almost be like if we were to ask a six year old child to hand down a verdict on corporate tax evasion. Could they really understand what they were deciding about? They would not understand the basics, like the Ricoh Statutes, or any kind of finance. To them it would be gibberish. These Corinthians did not have the spiritual wherewithal, and they did not have an experienced minister at the time, either. Remember, I mentioned in the other sermon, that after Paul left, they sent Apollos, but he was only there a short time, and then he left. And there is no indication that he left anyone there. And so, they were adrift and floundering. They were still very young in the faith. Okay. I have approached this from a certain direction. As a matter of fact, I have approached this from the exact opposite way that Paul did. Instead of going forward in the book, I am going to be going backwards toward the front because Paul had hit these things from the beginning. I needed to give this to you in this manner to help you understand where I am going. Remember, Paul said that they were puffed up.
What we have just read are all of the occurrences of the term, "puffed up." And, all of these were used by the apostle Paul. It is from the Greek word which sounds like the word it describes. It means to inflate; to blow or puff up; to cause to swell. It is a figure of conceit, arrogance, pride, self-importance, and haughtiness. Through all the examples we have just seen, we can add this to explain their problems with making righteous judgments. They had pride. Something was making them arrogant in the way they made decisions. They were allowing their pride in something they possessed to trump deciding to do what was rightsomething that they thought was right. Something that they thought was wise was becoming greater in their minds than what God said to do, or Paul said to do with the authority of Christ. So, they were, in essence, being self-righteous. They were putting something higher in their own minds than the righteousness of God; something of themselves; something that they had learned; something they had come to understand; something they had started to value, or had valued for a long time; and it was trumping the wisdom and righteousness of Godthe will of God. What was it? The answer was in I Corinthians 8, verse 1:
Now, you can tell that this was on Paul's mind throughout the writing of this whole epistle because by the time you get to chapter 13, he is telling them that love does not puff up.
That is a rather bold statement. He is essentially calling them a bunch of know-it-alls, and, a bunch of good-for-nothing know-it-alls, too. Their problem was that they thought they had knowledge, and they may have been very smart, very intelligent people. Actually they may have been very knowledgeable. But, Paul makes it clear that theirs was the wrong kind of knowledge. Now, perhaps what we are dealing with is that they had rudimentary Gnostic ideas along the lines of what later became known as Nicolaitanism. Nicolaitanism is the idea that what is done in the body is of little consequence since all that really matters takes place in one's spirit. Now, if we understand it from this point of view, their tolerance of the man who had his father's wife begins to make a bit of sense. They were thinking, "Oh, it is just a physical thing. We know that he is a believer. We know that he loves Christ. We know that he is committed to this way of life. So, let him stay among us, it will be better for him to stay among us because we can help him." They coddled this incestuous man, firm in the knowledge that despite his unmentionable marital situation, he was a Christian. Does that sound familiar? This sounds like a lot of stuff I read in current Protestant journals dealing with people and their problems. They are not aware that what they are doing is following a Gnostic idea that has been around for a couple of thousand years or more. Now, notice verse 3. Paul gets right to the answer here. This is Paul's answer to their being puffed up. This is hard to understand, though, because of the way that it has been translated:
That is Paul's answer. Now, you really have to think about this one. The answer is not just straight out. What he says is, "What we know, as carnal human beings, matters little or nothing." That is the first thing we have to understand. "That God knows us, that He has a relationship with us, is everything." Did you notice how Paul turned it around? They were saying, "Oh, I am a very spiritual man! I took a course in Greek logic one time, and now I know how to approach all these different situations!" And Paul says, "You have got to be kidding me! What you know means nothing! But that God knows you, is everything!" I have not explained it all yet. First he gets them to turn the situation around. He says, "You are looking in the wrong place, buddy. You are thinking about you, you, and you! And what you should really be thinking about is God, God, and Godwhat He has done, and what He continues to do, and that He is still our Father. Get that straight. Remember what Jesus said. He always made righteous judgments because He always did those things which pleased the Father." Okay. Now that we understand that we are to change our point of view on this, what is our part in the relationship? Paul tells us right here. Love God! That is your part to play. Love God! Agappa is the word here. Loving God is an action. It is not a feeling, necessarily. There are feelings involved, but the loving part, here, is a verb. Love is an action word. It is doing something. Paul is implying behavior, conduct, and adherence to a standard. What did Jesus say? "If you love Me, keep My commandments." (John 14:15) Later, the apostle John would write, "For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments." (I John 5:3) Loving God is keeping all the commandments. That is a very basic way to put it. Even more generally speaking, "Loving God is doing His will in all things." That is basically what the commandments are, they codify His will in various situations. They cover everything. So, in essence Paul tells the Corinthians, "I do not care how much you know, but I do care whether you are living God's way of life. And that tells me whether you love God, and your brothers, or not." We will now turn to I Corinthians 13. Now we know why this chapter is in I Corinthians! This is the love chapter. The love chapter, I Corinthians 13, is a weapon against their puffed up prideful knowledge. He is trying to get them to understand that they were thinking of themselves as being elevated, because they had this Greek learning, and that they need to forget all that, and start practicing the love of God. Notice how he goes through all this:
It would be an interesting study to go through there and check to see how many have to do pride!
When we get to that future time, we will know, just as well as we are known. It is going to be a long haul before we get to that point. Not all knowledge will come in this lifetime. But, what is most important is that God knows us, and we know Him. "Then I shall know just as I am known..." We will have the same love of God that He is showing us, and then we can then show Him.
And, that is what they were lacking. I hope this love chapter becomes more understandable in terms of the people there in Corinth. Their pride and their immature carnal knowledge was skewing their ability to judge righteously. That is, they could not judge based on Godly love. They were relying on knowledge that they received from the world. No wonder they could not make judgments based on love. They really had not developed any, or very much. As we might say, they had a boat-load of old leaven that they needed to purge before they could judge with sincerity and truth, which are based on the love of God. We will now turn to I Corinthians 2. Remember I said that he started with the solution. All of this works together. There are themes going in and out of his discussion here, and they are all focused towards one thing, correcting the Corinthian church, and getting them set on their feet, but they are all over the place.
He makes it very plain, here, right away in chapter 2, where their confidence and pride laythe wisdom and knowledge of men. They were puffed up with their pseudo-intellectual vanity. They thought the Greek wisdom was tops. That is why he started out in chapter 1 talking about the foolishness of preaching, or the foolishness of the message. He was saying to them that it seemed to be foolishness because they were still stuck on this worldly wisdom that they thought was so great. So, Paul made a point of not seeming to be overly knowledgeable as an example to them. He toned down his rhetoric, and gave them the simple truths of Christ's work of salvation. And he backed it up with Godly works infused with God's power. Perhaps these things were like healings. Perhaps he rebuked a few demons. But, more likely, this spiritual power that he showed was in things like giving wise counsel in helping people actually change their lives, and being able to see someone who once walked the streets suddenly become a virtuous woman. Maybe the powerful spiritual works were in sound reasoning from the scriptures, giving them powerful truths which answered the great questions of humanityWhy am I here? Why was I born? What is man? Is there a God? If there is, what is God doing? Where is all of this headed? And Paul was able, by the spirit and power that God gave him through the spirit, to answer these questions. And he did not have to use rhetoric that raised the roof. He did not have to have people dancing in the aisles because of their ecstasy over his beautiful words. He just gave them the simple truth as it says here, "of Jesus Christ, and Him crucified." He answered all the questions. In verse 4, where it says, "in demonstration of the Spirit, and of power...," 'demonstration' is a very general word. It might be better translated as, "irrefutable testimony." It is a word they used in court of somebody giving clinching evidence that would seal a case. He said, "The Holy Spirit, and the power that came through it, was able to give me irrefutable evidence that what I was saying was true." And, where it says, "of the Spirit, and of the power..." might be a "Paul-ism" where he is actually saying spiritual powerthe power that comes through the Holy Spirit. So, he used the two termsof the spirit, and of the power. And it parallels that in verse 5 where it ends with, "power of God." He is basically saying the same thing in both verses. So, Paul humbly let God work through him, and he said that this was far more effective than any kind of wisdom or rhetoric that he may have been able to stage for their benefit. He is showing them an example, opposite to theirs, and asking them to discern which is more effectivePaul's example of humbly and faithfully in love allowing God to work through His Spirit, and give irrefutable evidence; or, the Corinthians' example of spouting Greek philosophers, and believing they were so wise while letting sin dwell in their midst. Which is more effective? Which is more Godly?
He is telling them that if they have a desire for these mysteries, these deep things, this wisdom, it is there in Christianity. You cannot plumb the depths of God's word. It is too deep for all of us, no matter what our intellect. But then, he says,
"Because you are too carnal!" "I'd love to be able to give you the hidden wisdom, the mysteries. But, you are not able to handle it right now. It would blow you away!" So, he is giving them an enticement to hold on, and continue on, giving them encouragement to mature. "Yes, there are good things in here. We will get to them later. Just hang on and practice the love of God, and we will get to them. But, you need to be more spiritual. You cannot understand them now."
It opens up a whole new vista of gifts and understanding!
Now, as Herbert Armstrong taught us many, many years ago, often and repeatedly, the human mind can comprehend only physical things by observation through the senses, and then applying his own human reason. But, the things of God are hidden from the human mind unless and until the Holy Spirit is present to receive, compare, and discern the truth of them. God's Spirit, then, is the key to real Christian wisdom and understanding, because it provides the means and power of spiritual comprehension. If we do not have God's spirit, if it is not actively working within us, the things of God are not going to make sense. And so, what will we fall back on? The important point of this theme of I Corinthians, Judging Righteous Judgment, is what Paul says in verses 15 and 16. He said that a truly spiritual person is qualified, and able to make sound Godly judgments because he has the mind of Christ. He is able to discern what is truly important versus what is peripheral. That is, he will be able to prioritize things properly. He could be given a whole series of things that he could do, but if he is working with the mind of Christ, if he is allowing the spirit to flow through him, he will chose the one best thing that will not only be a right thing, but it will also bring glory to God. There may be several right things, but a mature person with the mind of Christ will choose that one best thing that will give God honor. It might happen in a situation, let's say, where there are several choices, and it might be the choice of living, and dying. Perhaps someone is pulled before the Inquisition, and there is a way to live, and a way to die. Both ways are open. And maybe there is a way to live that does not compromise the truth. We do not know the situation. I have not explained enough. It is just off the top of my head. But, maybe the decision to die is actually better than the decision to live. Would we have the spiritual wherewithal to make that decision? Jesus did. He said, "I will die. That is what I came for. That is what will bring the most honor and glory to God and do the greatest good work for all of mankind." Maybe that is an extreme situation, but that is how the spirit works. It is there, guiding us, giving us the ability to receive, compare, and discern the truth of the matter, and then make the best decision. A person who is using God's Spirit understands what God's will is, what God's purpose is, what God's goal for us is, and what God requires of us. And then, he decides, and then he acts. The Corinthians on the other hand were making such horrible judgments because they were still using the same patterns of thinking in the same false standards of knowledge that they had used before they were called. They were still carnal. This is what Paul urged them to purge from themselves. And also, this is what we need to heed. Is God in all our thoughts as we make decisions? Do we base our thinking on the word of God, which is the foundation of all knowledge? Is our Christian walk modeled after the example of Jesus Christ? Do we really have and use the mind of Christ? To close, turn to II Corinthians 10, as Paul is still thinking about this same idea, because the problems continued, although they did get better.
| |||||||||||||||
© Copyright 2002-2008 Church of the Great God. Contact Us. | |||||||||||||||
You Will Only See This Once | ||
|
The Bereans "received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so" (Acts 17:10-11). This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. |
|
We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time. |
||